Blog Archives

Nomad Flute: The Poetry of W.S. Merwin

One afternoon, when grief still hurt but not like bright sunlight, when parenting was just a synonym for exhaustion, a voice came out of the radio. An older voice, a voice that felt like it had known grief and beauty, love and loss. The voice said:

Almost to your birthday and as I
am getting dressed alone in the house
a button comes off and once I find
a needle with an eye big enough
for me to try to thread it
and at last have sewed the button on
I open an old picture of you
who always did such things by magic
one photograph found after you died
of you at twenty
beautiful in a way
I would never see
for that was nine years
before I was born
but the picture has
faded suddenly
spots have marred it
maybe it is past repair
I have only what I remember

The last line was the jolt of caffeine, stirring me from my slumber of exhausted days. He was saying what I had been struggling with since Kitty’s death: that I’d lose Kitty again once my memories of him started to fade. I have only what I remember. He was giving voice to what I fight even now in my time with Maya. It’ll not be long before I’ll not remember all her baby things, the way she is now. I have only what I remember.

The voice belonged to William Stanley Merwin and he read a poem “A Likeness” from his recent collection of poems, The Shadow of Sirius. Two other poems that he read aloud in the interview made me head to the local library for a copy.

Poems and lines flew off the page, lodging themselves in my brain in a way that few poems have.

part memory part distance remaining
mine in the ways that I learn to miss you
From what we cannot hold the stars are made – from Youth

Time unseen time our continuing fiction
however we tell it eludes our dear hope and our reason – from Secrets

As those who are gone now
keep wandering through our words – from The Morning Hills

Like William Stafford, a poet who I’ve often written about, his poems are meditations. A few words of it and I am a willing vessel, ready to carry whatever the day has to offer.

W.S. Merwin

(Image from flickr, thanks to cpacker66).

I obtained a collection of Merwin’s works called Migration. The book stayed with me all through the nine weeks it takes before the book must be returned to the library. After two more withdrawals from the library, I finally purchased the book.

Merwin’s poems run the gamut of human emotions and subjects. He can write just about being:

I believe in the ordinary day
that is here at this moment and is me
I do not see it going its own way
but I never saw how it came to me – from A Momentary Creed

Of the moment when we’re more alive than the sum of all the other days:

The trouble with pleasure is the timing
it can overtake me without warning
and be gone before I know it is here
it can stand facing me unrecognized
while I am remembering somewhere else – from One of the Butterflies

He can write about the beauty that we live immersed in, say a raindrop:

touch me this time
let me love what I cannot know
as the man born blind may love color
until all that he loves
fills him with color – from To The Rain

About the sorrow at an animal’s coming extinction:

Gray whale
Now that we are sending you to The End
That great god
Tell him
That we who follow you invented forgiveness
And forgive nothing – from For A Coming Extinction

Or of the loss of a rainforest:

I want to tell what the forests
were like
I will have to speak
in a forgotten language – from Witness

Or of the attraction of war:

When the war is over
We will be proud of course the air will be
Good for breathing at last
The water will have been improved the salmon
And the silence of heaven will migrate more perfectly
The dead will think the living are worth it we will know
Who we are
And we will all enlist again – from When The War is Over

Or of fairy tales, mystical one:

Stories come to us like new senses
a wave and an ash tree were sisters
they had been separated since they were children
but they went on believing in each other
though each was sure that the other must be lost – from Recognitions

Or of a lifetime spent together:

Let me imagine that we will come again
when we want to and it will be spring
we will be no older than we ever were
the worn griefs will have eased like the early cloud
through which the morning slowly comes to itself
and the ancient defenses against the dead
will be done with and left to the dead at last
the light will be as it is now in the garden
that we have made here these years together
of our long evenings and astonishment – from To Paula in Late Spring

The words, their arrangement. I want to hold them, running each one slowly through my mind, luxuriating in them. I want to be ensconced in them.

Very early on, Merwin let go of all punctuation in his poems. Read like this, eyes searching for the breaks, his poems take on an almost mystical quality, a freshness that never disappears. For example, consider the opening lines from the poem, The Emigre:

You will find it is
much as you imagined
in some respects
which no one can predict
you will be homesick
at times for something you can describe
and at times without being able to say
what you miss
just as you used to feel when you were at home

You can read a break after “in some respects”, reiterate that line and finish the rest of the stanza with one message. You can read a break after “imagined” and the poem reads well again. You can read a break after “predict” and the still the poem reads well. Each echoes a slightly different nuance of the same theme. Reread the two lines from “Secret” quoted above and you can play a similar game.

Merwin was born in the early years of the past century (how long ago it sounds, when I say ‘past century’). He came of age during WWII and enlisted in the army at age 17. Then, he realized what war meant and became a pacifist and refused to fight in the war. A crime for which he was sent to a mental institution. When I heard that, I was shocked. Here were a people, calling themselves the denizens of the greatest country in the world, thinking it was insane that someone refused to kill on order. Stafford too had refused to fight the same war and had been sent to a labor camp for that. In 1971, Merwin donated the money from his first Pulitzer Prize to fighting the draft, against the Vietnam War.

He eschwed a life in the academia and instead went to study Zen Buddhism in Maui and stayed back. He lives in a solar powered home that he built with his wife, Paula Schwartz, on an abandoned pineapple farm. He also worked to restore the neighboring rainforest of palm trees. He writes on scraps of paper with a pencil. He says that writing on a fresh sheet of paper or a typewriter is too much pressure to produce something deep and meaningful. With scraps of paper, anything is good. Stafford said similar things.

His poems, like Stafford’s, come from a place that lives on ideas like these, ideas of non-violence, ecology, a deep communion with all things alive, of living well and dying well. The sound of those poems stirs something deep in me, something that I cannot always access directly, but must come by obliquely.

Merwin’s output is prodigious by any standard: 25 volumes of just poetry. He also has nearly two dozen books of translations, 8 works of prose, and a memoir, “Summer Doorways.”. His output is also as varied as you can imagine.  Migration, a collection of his poems from 1952 to 2005, contains poems that are just a single line and poems that span double digit pages. He has written an entire novel in verse, The Folding Cliffs, about the history and legends of Hawaii.

In his interview with Bill Moyers, Merwin says: “… poetry always comes out of what you don’t know. And with students I say, knowledge is very important. Learn languages. Read history. Read, listen, above all, listen to everybody. Listen to everything that you hear. Every sound in the street. Every bird and every dog and everything that you hear. But know all of your knowledge is important, but your knowledge will never make anything. It will help you to form the things, but what makes something is something that you will never know. It comes out of you. It’s who you are.” Watch the whole interview. I found it a fascinating commentary on a life and the writing process.

These days, I’m a thief. I steal time. Mostly from Maya and Shanthala, but also from work, from all that calls to me all day, every day. I find little time to read long works of fiction or non-fiction. I switched to reading short stories and essays to better fit the time I could make. With poets like Stafford and Merwin, I find I can squeeze in an intense session in just a couple of minutes, reading that peels away the layers of my life, my self.

Who did I think was listening
when I wrote down the words
in pencil at the beginning
words for singing
to music I did not know
and people I did not know
would read them and stand to sing them
already knowing them
while they sing they have no names – from From the Start

Avatar: Old Body In New Clothes

Taking advantage of an unexpected day off, Shanthala and I watched the IMAX3D version of James Cameron’s “Avatar”. Hailed by critics and audiences alike, it has since sunk the top grossing movie of all time, the director’s own Titanic and become the biggest grosser of all time. While I joined the masses in taking it there, I can’t say that I wholeheartedly agreed with either the audiences or the critics.

Let me start with the good. The effects are spectacular. James Cameron has spent an enormous amount of time in constructing the world of Pandora, the planetary moon in the Alpha Centauri star system, on which the movie unfolds.  As a consequence, the visuals are stunning and so detailed, they probably hold up to repeated viewing. Cameron was apparently an adviser to NASA for the camera design used on the Mars mission and he’s clearly a technical genius. The visuals are not just randomly created for effects. Cameron has tried to ground this world in a decent amount of science. Quite a few commentators think that the science is even pretty good. A 350 page companion book to the movie, structured like an army field manual, covers in hardcore-fan-satisfying detail the geology and astronomy of Pandora, flora and fauna on Pandora and the physiology and culture of the Pandoran sentient beings, the Na’vi. The language of the Na’vi was constructed with the help of a linguist and has a website dedicated to the language, complete with flash cards to help you speak the language. So, what the Na’vi speak is not gibberish dressed up as an alien language.

And I don’t even think I’m qualified to appreciate the difficulties in filming the movie. The Wikipedia provides some jaw-dropping insights into the subject.

And now for my disappointments. Yes, the special effects are spectacular, but I never felt that I was looking at a real, non-computer animated world. Take Jurassic Park, as a point of comparison. At no point in that movie did I ever feel that I was watching computer animated images. And having watched IMAX movies before (those National Geographic or made-for-IMAX documentaries), I did not feel sufficiently immersed by the movie’s unique “immersion” technology. Watching an IMAX movie about the Grand Canyon a few years back, I felt my stomach plummet with the camera as it chased a hang glider over the edge of the canyon. No such thing happened as I watched the Na’vi soar over hanging mountains on top of strange looking birds. Shanthala reminded me that those IMAX movies were shown on gigantic screens. The Wikipedia points to others suffering from a similar problem as mine and that Shanthala is not incorrect. But still, I was disappointed.

What about the way the aliens look ? Yes, they’re 10-12 feet tall, blue, have a tail and their faces are a mixture of humans and cats. But they’re still so humanoid. Is this how imaginative you can get ? The ICICI blog, a blog about cognition and culture, however, defends Cameron’s vision saying, “Indeed, there are good reasons to expect that life on others planets might evolve as it did on Earth. Everywhere in the universe, living beings would face similar evolutionary problems: They need energy, detectors, and computational systems. And everywhere in the universe, they will discover the same solutions exactly as, on Earth, the same tricks (enzymes, sex, eyes, etc.) have been discovered again and again by different species.” Cameron states in an interview that he deliberately made the Na’vi look human to enable people to relate to them more easily. Otherwise, how many could empathize with the hero’s attraction to the Na’vi heroine ?

That said, I found the imagination still limiting. Why pair bonding between the Na’vi ? Do they have to sleep the way we do ? The men ruled the world, concerned with warfare and diktats. Were the Na’vi hunter-gatherers or agricultural settlers ? Nothing in the movie depicts how they acquire food, but a stratification of society of the form shown is closer to an agricultural world than a hunter-gatherer world. With a running time of over 2.5 hours, there was enough time to show all this, but did not, which disappointed me. Like most science fiction, the physics is well imagined, not so much the biology and culture. The only book that I’ve read that depicted alien culture, cognition and biology imaginatively was the Hominid series by Robert Sawyer.

The story is as cliched as cliche can be. A gentle, nature loving, technologically primitive society is under attack by greedy, blood thirsty corporations and their private armies in search of a valuable mineral called unobtanium. The utopian world of the noble savage is alive and well in the movie. The narrative follows a boringly predictable trajectory: the initiation into the ways of the natives, the rite of passage, the chanting and music of the natives, the hero’s change of heart, the final battle between the hero and his nemesis, his one time boss. Nothing surprised me in the story, nothing at all but the effects. Further, while upholding the peace-loving nature of the natives, the narrative sadly resorts to a stereotypical, violent resolution of the conflict.

And the characters ? Female leads in Cameron movies have always been the strong, kick-ass type and the movie has three strong women in prominent roles including the heroine. The hero is naive, brash and unafraid of authority, but with a heart of gold, a “gift”. He goes on to charm the natives, fall in love with the daughter of the head of the natives and save their world. The objective scientist who is full of questions and curiosity but who hasn’t the heart of gold cannot do what he can. Other prosaic characters include a jealous rival among the natives – the heir apparent – who has been promised the hand of the daughter, the queen who is a shaman, the friendly sidekicks, the insiders who help the hero, the violent military commander with no shred of respect for life, the uncaring corporate bureaucrat. The good have no flaws and the bad have no redemptive qualities. There is not one 3D character in this 3D spectacle.

I thought that Cameron indulges in some clever tongue-in-cheek in renarrating the destruction of the ecology of the native Americans, more commonly called Indians. He draws much from the culture of the real India (not Columbus’ misidentified continent), from the title of the movie to the color of the Na’vi to some words in the Na’vi language. For example, the word for bonding or feeling the connection between the Na’vi and the rest of the planet is “sahelu”, a derivation of the Hindi word for friendship, saheli. The Na’vi are blue in homage to the Hindu deities like Krishna and Rama, according to Cameron. I wonder if Cameron came up with the name “Na’vi” as a pun on Marathi where Navi means new (as in Navi Mumbai).

Avatar feels like the Star Wars of this Facebook generation. I think the floodgates are about to burst on commercial 3D movies. A slew of trailers of soon to be released 3D movies preceded the showing of Avatar. I imagine the movie moguls are rubbing their hands in glee at the prospect of the audiences flooding back to the movie halls. People who own fancy, expensive home theater are now upended by a technology that cannot be matched in their homes. No more waiting for DVDs or even Blu-Ray discs. If you want the ultimate in effects, come to the movie hall. And the consumer industry must be salivating at the soon-to-follow arrival of the wave of new TVs, home theatres and sound systems. IMAX, Discovery and Sony have already announced the launch of 24×7 3D TV channel. Avatar video games are on their way as is of course, two more sequels to the movie. Avatar franchised dolls and toys will be on every shelf accessible to kids. The very value – commercial exploitation – that the movie deplores and holds as the chief reason for the destruction of native habitats, is being unleashed as a consequence of its success. That is how success is defined in this globalized culture where economics is king.

I guess the laugh is on me, the nerd in me expecting to see the utopian union of great literature and great art with popular success. I wasn’t old enough to appreciate Star Wars when it came out. I maybe too old to appreciate Avatar.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Happy Marriage

What makes for a happy marriage ? What makes two people stick together, day after day, month after month, year after mundane year ? Is it love ? Is it compatibility ? Is it fear of being alone ? Is it social pressure ? Is it ennui, the deadening of desire and energy that seems to come with age ? Is it habit ? Is it the pain of modern divorces, with their petty separations – this pickle bottle is mine, my mother pickled it and you never cared for it, this painting is mine, this coffee table book on Maine is mine ? Is it the fear of knowing that the relationship has been no more than the sum of their collected possessions and a shared bed ? Is it children ? Is it a biological need ? Is it the willful looking past hurts rendered, consciously and unconsciously ? Is it money ?

And what are the ingredients of a happy marriage ? Tolstoy wrote that all happy families are alike. So what is common across all happy marriages ? Is it fealty, physical and emotional ? I’m so faithful to you, I haven’t sleep with anyone else, even if we haven’t slept together in eons; I don’t discuss my fears and confusion with anyone else, I don’t even acknowledge them to myself anymore ? Is it the ability to work through conflicts, to sleep with compromises and to not think of them as compromises ? Is it the lack of conflicts ? Is it respect ? Are successful marriages egalitarian ?

Few books I’ve read explore the narrative of a marriage, searching for answers to these questions. Most are about either the romance or the breakup, or about infidelity. Only a few are about the sustenance past puppy romance, about the transition from pop songs about love to jazz songs about relationships, of the transformation of coca cola to fine wine. The first book about a married life that stayed with me was Joan Didion’s “The Year of Magical Thinking”. The book was about the grief of losing her husband of forty years, but in chronicling the silence, she chronicled what lived before. She wrote: “Marriage is not only time: it is also, paradoxically, the denial of time. For forty years I saw myself through John’s eyes. I did not age.”

Two books, one finished a month back and the other still in progress, are two recent reads that explore the inner life of a marriage.

A Happy Marriage by Rafael Yglesias. The title leapt out at me as I passed a neighborhood book store. The reviews it garnered made me pick up a copy from the local library. The first chapter barely interested me. The second walloped me. Never before have I read a book that laid out with such unflinching detail what it is like to be by the side of your spouse dying of cancer. The passages stunned me with their rawness and honesty. How do the people around you react when they know that you’ll die in two weeks ? What do you do ? When do you choose to say goodbye ? Who do you choose to say it to ? When is it too early and when may it be too late ? He writes the details he has to manage, people (the in-laws, the parents, the children, the friends), the choices of medical treatment, who gets to see her and for how long, what does she have the strength for and for how long. Just as Joan Didion’s book first showed me a glimpse of the foreign country that is grief, this book offered me a clearer glimpse of the landscape of the end of days of a spouse. Like Didion’s book, this book is semi-autobiographical, a mostly truthful rendering of the death of his wife, Margaret (only some of the dialogues have been made up, to make up for gaps in memory).

Juxtaposed with these chapters of end of days are chapters of courtship, marriage, parenting, the temptations of love outside marriage and the reasons for sticking on. While the chapters on courtship come off seeming weaker than the ones that describe her end, their courtship is rendered with honesty in unusual scenes, vulnerable scenes, vulnerability brought on by patterns laid out by the author’s culture, complicated by his early success (the author was a successful, published author at 16, a position I envied. He narrates the consequences of such an early success with such candor, I reconsidered my envy). Some of the author’s awkwardness reminded me of my own when I courted Shanthala. I read with a sense of deja vu scenes such as the awkward birthday gifts that he usually got her in the early days.

Yglesias writes: “He longed to penetrate the mystery of how they had managed to live a life together while they were so different in their natures and in their expectations of one another. And if there was no answer to be found in a last talk with his wife, at least he wanted to tell her what she had meant to him, and to hear what he had meant to her, because soon there would be only the loneliness of monologue.” Yglesias’s unstated question is whether their’s was a happy marriage. As I read the book, I wondered about some preconceived notions I had about a happy marriage such as: Is a happy marriage empty of strife, of infidelity ? Do opposites attract only during courtship or can it also cement a marriage ?

The other book, the one that I’m still reading, is Wallace Stegner’s Pulitzer Prize winning “Angle of Repose”. The narrator is an old, wheelchair bound historian, Lyman Ward. Trapped within the confines of a frail, paraplegic body, living alone – stubbornly, despite the misgivings of his son – he tries to piece together the life of his grandmother. Like Mark Knopfler, in narrating the story of a single life, he narrates a larger story, of a country, of a generation. Interposing passages of his grandmother’s life are Lyman Ward’s musings and aspects of his life. His introspective thoughts are filled with a grace and luminescence that make me want to go back and read them again and again.

The book drew me in with its meditative power, observations of nature, musings about the applications of the laws of physics to life, of life at the wild frontier that was the American West. For example, the very first page has this passage about the intersection of time and personality: “Before I can say I am, I was. Heraclitus and I, prophets of flux, know that the flux is composed of parts that imitate and repeat each other. Am or was, I am cumulative, too. I am everything I ever was, whatever you and Leah may think. I am much of what my parents and especially my grandparents were – inherited stature, coloring, brains, bones (that part unfortunate), plus transmitted prejudices, cultures, scruples, likings, moralities, and moral errors I defend as if they were personal and not familial.”. In another passage, Lyman Ward muses about the Doppler Effect of the life of his grandmother: “The sound of anything coming at you – a train, say, or the future – has a higher pitch than the sound of the same thing going away. … I would like to hear your life as you heard it, coming at you, instead of hearing it as I do, a sober sound of expectations reduced, desires blunted, hopes deferred or abandoned, chances lost, defeats accepted, griefs borne”. In a third, he writes about a morning in Grass Valley, California: “May 28, I see by the calendar. The brief and furious spring of these foothills is over, summer is here before I saw it coming. The wildflowers along the fence are dried up, the wild oats are gold, not green, the pine openings no longer show the bloody purple of Judas trees, the orchard and the wisteria are in fruit and pod, not blossom. From now until the November rains, the days will be so unchanging that without the Saturday ballgame I won’t be able to tell week from weekend. Who wants to ? When I was a boy here, summer was narcosis. I am counting on it to be what it always was.”. I wish I could write a tenth as sublimely as Stegner does.

In trying to piece together his grandmother’s life, Lyman Ward realizes what he’s doing is trying to understand the marriage of his grandparents. Lyman Ward explains to his skeptical son: “What interests me in all these papers is not Susan Burling Ward the novelist and illustrator, and not Oliver Ward the engineer, and not the West they spend their lives in. What really interests me is how two such unlike particles clung together, and under what strains, rolling downhill into their future until they reached the angle of repose where I knew them. That’s where the interest is. That is where the meaning will be if I find any”.

Two thirds of the book are a record of that relationship. Of a relationship forged by distance, by the hard frontier life. And in describing that relationship, he also describes the conquest of the West, of life in one horse mining towns, of lynchings by vigilantes, the conflict of interest between government surveyors and the miners wishing access to that information before it became public, and the people who lived in these times. But the kernel rests on the unlikely relationship. The remaining third of the book cover aspects of Lyman Ward’s life, how this quest affects his life and his graceful musings.

Like Yglesias’ book, Stegner’s book is part fiction and part true story. The characterization of the grandmother and grandfather are also drawn from Stegner’s mother and father. Stegner also modeled the grandmother on Mary Hallock Foote, whose letters provided a basis for the novel (and stirred up some cries of plagiarism). The novel is peppered with cameos by real life Western explorers and engineers such as Clarence King, Henry Janin and Samuel Emmons.

The story of people striking West in search of opportunity, fame and fortune is not unlike an immigrant story. Of the many Indians I have seen in this country, the price of the journey has always been paid more dearly by the women, just as women and children have always paid the price of men’s ambitions through history. A passage that addresses the plight of such women is an example of the universality of Stegner’s writing: “When frontier historians theorize about the uprooted, the lawless, the purseless, and the socially cut-off who settled the West, they are not talking about people like my grandmother. So much that was cherished and loved, women like her had to give up; and the more they gave it up, the more they carried it helplessly with them”.

Shanthala grew up in a single place since she can remember, mostly in the same house. I grew up everywhere, uprooted every 3-4 years. Shanthala, like Scarlett of Gone with the Wind, is rejuvenated by a visit home, her parents’ home. I envy her. I wish sometimes a place could rejuvenate me so, a place I could call home the way she does. Stegner addresses this feeling from a different perspective, but in a way that touches the essence of my envy when he writes: “I wonder if ever again Americans can have the experience of returning to a home place so intimately known, profoundly felt, deeply loved, and absolutely submitted to ? It is not quite true that you can’t go home again. I have done it, coming back here. But it gets less likely. We have had too many divorces, we have consumed too much transportation, we have lived too shallowly in too many places”. Reading this, I realized that I was an immigrant before I came to the US, have been an immigrant all my life, living too shallowly in too many places, uprooted just as I was beginning to set roots.

Great literature can speak to people of completely disparate backgrounds, to the common humanity that binds us all. Stegner’s book is great literature.

I highly recommend both books.

You can read excerpts of both “A Happy Marriage” and “Angle of Repose” online. I also recommend Terry Gross’ interview of Rafael Yglesias (transcript available too).

Time Passages: The Music Of Al Stewart

“Two broken tigers on fire in the night
Flicker their souls to the wind”

Two of the most beautiful lines that I’ve heard in all of my musical journeys. Can you believe a song, a rock song at that, that grabs you like a thriller from the first lines and doesn’t let go till the end, almost eight minutes later. And the song has a beautiful, sad ending like a great epic. And the song is the chronicle of the Third Reich’s disastrous invasion of Russia, the beginning of its end, told from the perspective of a Russian foot soldier.

Or how about this song, “The Running Man”, that chronicles the life of a hunted man (a Nazi ?), running from the hunted, that starts with:

Before the phone hits the receiver
You’re halfway to the door
The voice said ‘get out while you can,
There’s just ten minutes, nothing more’

Or a song about the French Revolution called “Palace of Versailles” that starts with:

The wands of smoke are rising
From the walls of the Bastille
And through the streets of Paris
Runs a sense of the unreal
The kings have all departed
There servants are nowhere
We burned out all their mansions
In the name of Robespierre

Probably no other rock artist has set history to such beautiful music and woven such compelling historical tales as Al Stewart.

I was introduced to his music in Paris. When I went to meet a friend in one of the company apartments, I heard this beautiful music coming from one of the rooms. I asked what the music was and who lived in that room. I was told that the guy who lived there was a snob who had the most expensive and gorgeous sounding music system in all the company. Snob or not, I wanted to know what the music was. I knocked on the door and entered his den. A guy sat on the floor, sprouting a moustache and an attitude. I introduced myself and asked him what was playing. He said, “Al Stewart”, disdainfully. The song that I heard was “Roads to Moscow”, the song whose lines I quoted at the start of this post. The album was “The Best of Al Stewart“.

I remained in the room listening to the rest of the music and a few months later, the snob and I were good friends. We’d spend hours listening to music. I was coming to Paris from my years spent in small towns of Southern India where western music was hard to come by. And what did come by was the mainstream stuff, stuff that I had grown tired of, stuff that was unmemorable a week or a month later. I was in search of something less ephemeral, more soul grabbing. Deepak introduced me to a lot of new music, music that went under the genre of progressive rock, of groups such as Yes, ELP, Rush and King Crimson. Of all of them, the only two that remained are Al Stewart and Camel.

Al Stewart has a pleasing and distinctive voice to accompany his distinctive musical stories. Hear it once and you can recognize it again quite easily, just like Mark Knopfler’s guitaring. His musical journey began with a guitar and this voice, singing folk rock songs of intimate portraits gleaned from his life. Stories of girl friends – won, lost and love still searching – of friends and their lives, of street life and characters like history teachers. Here are some lines from one of his early songs, In Brooklyn:

‘Oh I come from Pittsburgh to study astrology,’
She said as she stepped on my instep,
‘I could show you New York with a walk between Fourth Street and Nine.’
Then out of her coat taking seven harmonicas
She sat down to play on a doorstep sayin
‘Come back to my place I will show you the stars and the signs’
So I followed her into the black lands
Where the window frames peel and flake
And the old Jewish face behind the lace
Even now trying to get to see what’s cooking
Just John the Baptist in the park getting laid thinking there’s no-one looking
And its eighty degrees and I’m down on my knees in Brooklyn

Interestingly, his first single, in 1967, included guitaring by the legendary Led Zeppelin guitarist, Jimmy Page. His albums also featured good instrumentals such as “A Small Fruit Song” from his third album, Zero She Flies. At one of his concerts, he joked that jazz is what happens when a musician continues to play even after they don’t know what they’re playing, this despite his third album containing an 18 minute track that chronicled his love life. The song reads like a rock version of Raj Kapoor’s “Jaane Kahan Gaye Woh Din”. Wikipedia credits the song as being the first mainstream record release to include the “f” word. I like how the song ends:

Of all the girls I ever knew
some loved and some denied me
And all the words I ever said
have been no use to hide me
And all the songs I ever sung
each one of them untied me
And all the girls I ever loved
have left themselves inside me

Wikipedia has this to say about this stage of his career: “Stewart was a key figure in a fertile era in British music and he appears throughout the musical folklore of the age. He played at the first ever Glastonbury Festival in 1970, knew Yoko Ono pre-Lennon, shared a London apartment with a young Paul Simon, and hosted at the legendary Les Cousins folk club in London in the 1960s.”

Things began to change with his fifth album, “Past, Present and Future“, released in 1973. Six of the eight songs from that album had historical roots from melodies about the second World War to a portrait of the American president, Warren Harding, to one about the prophecies of Nostradamus. This was the first album to be properly released in the US, though it didn’t receive much airplay on commercial radio stations due to the length of its best songs.

Two albums later came the meteoric “Year Of The Cat”. Al Stewart is mostly known to everybody for this album. He says that this was attempt to construct a chart-busting album. “If this didn’t work, I don’t know how to create one”, he said. It had fewer historical songs than say “Past, Present and Future”, but the three that it did were gems: Lord Grenville, On The Border and Flying Sorcery. The title track is among my all time favorites, along with Roads to Moscow. His description of the woman in the title track is brilliant and unique:

She comes out of the sun in a silk dress running
Like a water colour in the rain

as is the the starting of the song:

On a morning from a Bogart movie
In a country where they turn back time
You go strolling through the crowd like Peter Lorre
Contemplating a crime

It is a song that speaks to the senses with lines of incense and patchouli, blue tiled walls, drum beats and rhythms.

The rest of his albums never quite achieved the popularity of Year of the Cat though they possessed gems such as Merlin’s Time, Running Man, Song On The Radio and Palace of Versailles. He mostly disappeared from the mainstream radio scene. But that hasn’t stopped him from continuing to put out albums. His last album “Sparks of Ancient Light” was released in 2008. The highlight of the album was the song “Shah of Shahs” about the last days of Reza Shah Pahlavi of Iran. He sings:

After these processions comes the sweeping up
The rag and bone possessions, an old tin cup
The army trucks have hauled away the newly slain
The angry crowd retreats, but they’ll be back again

And the prisoner in the palace does not understand
The ingratitude around him after all he’s done and planned
But if this the way that it must be then he’ll be damned
If he will let them take away his perfect dream

….

He cried inside the limousine and at the airport too
Where the soldier knelt before him and kissed his shoe
He flew across the desert and the open sea
While they tore down all his statues and his legacy

And the victor greets the newsmen with a strange and stoic style
They take a hundred thousand pictures and in none of them a smile
But this is just the way that it must be now for a while
he’s only come to bring another perfect dream

Luckily for me, he still tours, performing at small, off beat but popular stages. He is back to being a folk artist again, singing his popular and not-so-popular tunes with a just a guitar. He’d sometimes be accompanied by his then collaborator, guitarist Laurence Juber. Almost twenty years after I first heard his song, I saw him perform live. He came to the Bay Area twice within a year and we saw him both times, driving nearly two hours each way the second time. His concert was charming despite the lack of orchestration because he also spoke well, with understated, wry British humor.

In the music shops of Paris at that time I lived there, only a handful of his albums were available, all very expensive. So Deepak and I purchased an album each, Year of The Cat, and its followup, Time Passages. I had to wait till I came to the US to buy some of his other albums. After collecting seven of his albums, I thought I had enough. For a while, he vanished from my music scene as jazz and Mark Knopfler supplanted just about everything else.

Then Maya was born. A child can begin a journey of rediscovery. One afternoon, looking for some music with an afternoon mood, I played Lord Grenville and Year of the Cat to Maya. She was hooked to both songs and for over two months now, they continue to be the songs she takes to her afternoon nap. I’ve introduced other songs such as Time Passages, Almost Lucy and Palace of Versailles, all of which she likes. Roads to Moscow is one of her favorite bedtime tracks. Last night, she evan began humming the chorus of the track. As I listened to Roads to Moscow, to her humming and watched the joy in her face as she listened to the song, my thoughts harked back to my history with Al Stewart and I drifted into those Time Passages.

It was late in December, the sky turned to snow
All round the day was going down slow
Night like a river beginning to flow
I felt the beat of my mind go
Drifting into time passages
Years go falling in the fading light
Time passages
Buy me a ticket on the last train home tonight

Well I’m not the kind to live in the past
The years run too short and the days too fast
The things you lean on are the things that don’t last
Well it’s just now and then my line gets cast into these
Time passages
There’s something back here that you left behind
Oh time passages
Buy me a ticket on the last train home tonight

Al Stewart picture from flickr, courtesy of ac4lt.

Get Lucky: A Review

September doesn’t just herald the coming change of season. For me and several others around the world, every two years, it heralds the release of a new Mark Knopfler album. Get Lucky, his seventh solo album (including his duet with Emmylou Harris) was released a few weeks back, with just about as much fanfare as his previous releases; that is, almost none. An email about pre-concert ticket sales for a concert next April was how I came to know of this album.

Though the album was to be released only on September 14th (15th in the US), I got lucky and found out that my Rhapsody music subscription service allowed me to listen to the entire album a full week before the release. That alone justified the monthly subscription that I pay for Rhapsody. Coupled with Roku Soundbridge 1001, I listened to the entire album on my hi-fi system.

Compared to his previous album, Kill To Get Crimson, Get Lucky is a more modest effort, a notch or two below his best, especially in song writing, which has become his primary focus.

Across eleven tracks and 52 minutes, Knopfler uses flute, whistle, accordion and strings to produce a sound that is a throwback to the soundtracks of Local Hero and Cal. It is a september record: a few upbeat sunny songs but mostly quiet, midtempo tracks, tracks composed with a knowledge of the coming cold, austere times.

Three tracks stood out immediately. Hard Shoulder, the second song in the album, is a heartbreaking song about an unexpected loss. In a style that he employed on Hill Farmer Blues from The Ragpicker’s Dream, he starts with a workman listing out the things he has, the tools of his trade and then quietly slips in the real subject.

I’ve got latches for windows, handles for doors,
Grinders and scrapers and sanders for floors,
Rake for the gravel, chains for the snow,
Always got the shovel – you never know
I never thought you’d go

A workman, has stopped on the shoulder of a road, trying to recover from the loss. And with beautiful wordplay, he mixes the shoulder of the road with the need for a shoulder to cry on.

A few years back, we were having some repairs done on the house. The workman called to say the morning of the repairs that he had had a family emergency and that he couldn’t make it that day. I’ll call later and reschedule, he said. I was a little miffed (I had to shuffle my schedules so that I could be home when he showed up), but didn’t think much more. He called back a few days later and we rescheduled for him to come a week later.

He was an immigrant, like me, but eking out his existence in a much harder way than I ever had to. As he was doing his work, I remembered his family emergency and asked him if everything was alright. I remember how he looked at me, his clear blue eyes shattering as he said, “My daughter died last week. She was six years old. She had a fever that led to complications she never recovered from. That morning I was to come to your house, we had to rush her to the hospital”. I held him as he cried a little. I thought about my getting a little ruffled over his rescheduling. How little we know of the lives we call upon to care for our needs. Listening to Hard Shoulder reminded me of that man.

In true Knopfler fashion, the loss is never spelled out. A first reading made me think that it was about a lover leaving. But subsequent readings made me revise that opinion: this could be about any loss.

The second stand out track was the gentle waltz, Monteleone. The song is about John Monteleone, who Knopfler calls the world’s greatest living builder of the arch top guitar. The song is about his working of the wood to produce a beautiful musical instrument. I love the line “the chisels are calling”:

The chisels are calling
Its time to make sawdust
Steely reminders of things left to do
Monteleone, a mandolin’s waiting for you

The final standout track is also, in my opinion, the finest on the record, So Far From the Clyde. The song is about a ship taken to a breaker yard, some desolate beach in some impoverished part of India. I felt my insides rip as he sings about the ship as it is first shattered by riding it hard into the ground and then hacked and sawed off “’til there’s only a stain in the sand”. The ship comes alive, becomes a living thing. In one beautiful stanza, he sings:

As if to a wave
from her bows to her rudder
bravely she rises
to meet with the land
Under their feet
they all feel her keel shudder
A shallow sea washes their hands

I love the way he mixes in the metaphor of Pilate’s washing off his hands at the judgement of Jesus to the actions of the people involved in the tearing down of the ship.

Again, the song at one level, can be treated as merely the story of a ship, or it can be treated as an elegy to the end of a way of life. The song reminded me of an article that I had just read on NYT, about the lonely, wretched existence of many elderly immigrants in this country. The lead anecdote was about a Sikh father, living in the not far-off East Bay town of Fremont. Many of these immigrants had been cast aside by their children after being brought to this country. Now far from their social network, their ways of knowing and being, a stranger in a strange land, they seek solace in the company of fellow immigrants in similar positions and return to their rented places to die lonely deaths. Not unlike a ship that sailed proud and free for many years but taken at its end to a strange place. From the article:

Mr. Singh, the widower, grew up in a boisterous Indian household with 14 family members. In Fremont, he moved in with his son’s family and devoted himself to his grandchildren, picking them up from school and ferrying them to soccer practice. Then his son and daughter-in-law decided “they wanted their privacy,” said Mr. Singh, an undertone of sadness in his voice. He reluctantly concluded he should move out.

So when he leaves the Hub, dead leaves swirling around its fake cobblestones, Mr. Singh drives to the rented room in a house he found on Craigslist. His could be a dorm room, except for the arthritis heat wraps packed neatly in plastic bins.

The album is unusual in that it comes with some liner notes by Knopfler, a man known for his understated, taciturn persona. Knopfler writes that this album was a personal one more than usual. His uncle, dead at the age of 20 in WWII, is the piper in “Piper to the End”, his father makes an cameo on “Before Gas and TV” and his own childhood and adolescent life is the fabric from which songs such as Border Reiver and Get Lucky are sown. But I found his songwriting on most of the songs not upto his usual exemplary standard.

Maya likes the three songs that I mentioned as well as the title track and Border Reiver. Especially, Monteleone which is one of her staple goodnight songs now.

There’s so little new music that soothes me. Don’t get me wrong. I continue to find new music that I enjoy, new styles and new artists. But novelty isn’t all that it’s cut out to be. Homecoming is not about novelty, but it is among the most emotionally complex and satisfying experiences. Listening to Knopfler is like a homecoming to me. Not all homecomings are as good and satisfying. But we go home anyways. And so, I’ll listen to this album.

Powered by ScribeFire.